Yesterday I fiddled with toning cyanotype. First experiments were fairly positive, with two, maybe three out of eight working out.
I used green tea.
Wet the print, then a bath in a tray with 2L water mixed with a spoonful of washing soda. The bleaching was quick and noticeable.
Then in a tray with green tea for about three minutes.
Then into a tray with water/H202 mix, really just a rinse.
Agitate at each step.
There was still a lot of blue showing, so I dunked and agitated it in the washing soda again and then back in the tea and it started to turn brown.
Last, a clear water rinse in the utility sink in our garage, then the print was hung to dry.
I tried a few different variations of the above, using prints from the past that didn’t make the cut. I have a whole folder of them. Success with cyanotype has not come easy.
This freakin’ thing is HUGE at 4″ deep, nearly 5″ tall, and 7 1/2″ wide. It weighs in at 1.62 lbs.
The pix are good sized, with the actual image 2 7/16″ tall x 3 7/8″ wide. The whole integral film packet is is 3 3/8″ x 4 1/4″.
I came with a snap-on close-up filter, but ~16″ is as close as it’ll let you get.
I opened the box, attached the strap, plugged in the batteries, then I burned through a 10-pack of the wide film walking around the house, garage, and yards.
Fun camera. It’ll take a little getting use to the heft, and framing with the viewfinder, but it does take pretty cool shots.
Vic’s addiction, Dead roses, Buddha, Lieve’s addition.
And a Polaroid 405 back, not t’mention a healthy stash of fuji peel-apart.
And a shade cloth.
And a Toyo focusing loupe.
And light meters.
And a sturdy old Calumet tripod.
Using all that was one of 2020’s goals.
Getting out with all this stuff is now a 2021 goal.
Wish me luck.
** I also ordered that cool LomoGraflok 4×5 instant back (and 10 2-packs of Instax Wide film. That’s 200 shots!). Their site lists an April 2021 ship date – here’s hoping it arrives before Spring ‘Roid Week, which starts on 4/18. Fingers crossed!
It’s funny how sometimes you look at a picture (or 3) and dismiss them as not being worthy. They’re put in an envelope or box, stored away, and quickly forgotten.
I came across these three Instax Mini 8 shots just before the start of Fall ‘Roid Week. They were in a Instax Monochrome box on my desk, a box I hadn’t opened for who knows how long.
I shuffled through all the pictures and noticed these three under-exposed shots being somewhat similar. Interesting.
Only then did it dawn on me to group them as an abstract triptych.
Back in February I attended a Cyanotype workshop at a local art center and by May I’d assembled the chemicals and miscellaneous tools and materials needed to get started.
I’ve made cyanos using bits of nature, cyanos of original geometric designs, and cyanos using digital negatives created from photos – old and new – picked from the archives.
These are the latest four photo-cyanos…
B’s reel 6″ x 6″ on 9″ x 12″ Canson Bristol board Original image
Ol’ Glory 6″ x 6″ on 9″ x 12″ Canson Bristol board Original image
ARS 6″ x 6″ on 9″ x 12″ Canson Bristol board Original image
Whirlwind 6″ x 6″ on 9″ x 12″ Canson Bristol board Original image
To start the experiment, I printed a few black and white shots on regular Instax Square film, taken using the LX100 just to see if the idea was feasible.
It was. The three shots above were proof enough.
Over the last month and a half I’ve printed a handful of decent shots, scanned a few, and still have a coupla’ packs of Instax Black to use before ‘Roid Week gets here.
Every shot had differently lighting, so a consistent process was never really an option, but I still managed to get some satisfying results.
I made four instant shots in-between setting up and shooting with the pinholes.
I was quite happy with one particular instant and posted it on my film IG, @dogbonesoup
The other three didn’t seem to capture the story, how I feel, or what I liked about this location and vantage point.
This was back in July 2019. Over a year ago.
This past week I’ve looked back again at the instants from that morning – they’re in a stack of various sized instant shots on my desk I need to organize and store – and what caught my eye this time around was a different shot that was a little overexposed and somewhat blown out.
My position in relation to the sun had changed, and when I moved I lost the shade from the structure.
My position in relation to the sun had changed, and when I moved I lost the shade from the structure. That also means that a couple of these instants were overexposed because I didn’t change the settings on the camera accordingly.
Anyway, today I scanned the two that illustrated the point I’m trying make, here…
Looking at the two scans side-by-side, I am drawn to the dream-like feel of the overexposed shot.
The good exposure, while nicely composed, looks a little tame. Staid. A well documented structure. Very little emotion.
In contrast, the overexposed instant has so much more going for it. I holds a story. Feeling. Nostalgia. Mystery. A sense of wanderlust.
Emotion.
I love that this shot has a toy-camera vibe to it. I guess stepping out of that shadow proved to be a good thing.